Determining The
Effect That Democratic and Republican Parties Have on The Unemployment Rate
Introduction
One of the main subjects that is discussed prior to elections is how each
candidate will use monetary and fiscal policy to affect such variables as
unemployment and inflation. Since, as
the Phillips Curve shows us, the change in unemployment and the change in
inflation are negatively correlated, and it is
generally considered favorable for each to have low growth, each candidate has
to choose whether a low unemployment rate or a low inflation rate is more
favorable. It is
generally assumed that the decision will be made according to the
candidates’ political party: Democrats aim to lower unemployment, and
Republicans aim to lower inflation. It
therefore seems probable that unemployment will on average be lower during the
terms of democratic presidents than during terms of republican presidents. However, the data and regressions presented
here show that political party has no significant effect on the unemployment
rate.
Model
To determine the factors that have
an effect on unemployment, I used the economic model that shows that
unemployment is a shortage in the demand for labor. Therefore to reduce unemployment the demand
for labor has to be increased, which is done through
increasing the equilibrium quantity of aggregate demand. In the aggregate supply - aggregate demand
model (AS-AD model), aggregate demand is the sum of consumption, investment,
government expenditure and the net exports (exports - imports). Anything that has
an effect on these factors, including monetary and fiscal policy, will in turn
have an effect on unemployment. For
example, as demand for goods and services increase, firms have to increase
supply to meet the higher demand. To
increase output requires an increase in inputs, specifically, labor and
materials. This increase produces a
shift in the demand curve in the labor market.
A shift in the demand, which is an increase in demand for labor at any
given wage results in a reduction in unemployment. To create an equation I used unemployment as
the dependent variable, and the independent variables of government deficit,
change in money supply, the T - bill interest rate and a dummy variable called
Democrat that has a value of one if the president for that period was a
democrat and a value of zero if the president was a republican. Together these variables account for the
affects that the government can have on the unemployment rate. The equation is as follows:
Unemployment = b0 + b1*Democrat + b2*Govdef
+ b3*Changemoneysup + b4*Tbillinterstrate + e
Data
The data for the regression was taken from a DRI database from Eviews. The observations used are quarterly from the
second quarter of 1959 to the third quarter of 2002. Where appropriate, the variables are in 2002
dollars. The change in money supply
variable measures the percent difference in the money supply in the current
period compared to the last period. The
T-Bill interest rate is the rate on six month U.S. Treasury Bills. Since interest
rates tend to rise and fall together, I used this as a representative of
interest rates in general. Essentially
it is measuring the cost of borrowing money.
The variable government deficit is measured as
the percent of real GDP. Although
taxation is fiscal tool that affects the unemployment rate, it is not represented as its own variable in this
regression. The form that the government
deficit variable takes accounts for the effects of taxation. This is because the government deficit is the difference
between the amount of tax collected by the government and the total government
expenditure. For this regression the
variable represents the effect that tax has on unemployment as well as the
effect that government expenditure has. The Democrat variable is assigned a value of one during the quarters there are
Democratic presidents and a value of zero during the quarters there are
Republican presidents.
Results
The regression of the equation:
Unemployment = b0 + b1*Democrat + b2*Govdef
+ b3*Changemoneysup + b4*Tbillinterstrate + e
produced estimates for the coefficients for
each of the variables. The results of
the regression showed the coefficient of the Democrat variable to be -0.25. This means
that the unemployment rate is only a quarter of a point lower when Democrats
are in office. However, the results show the standard
error to be 0.17. Using this standard
error, I tested to see whether the coefficient is significantly different from
zero. The results from a T-test gave the
variable a T-statistic of -1.46. The
absolute value of the T-statistic is less than the critical value of 1.98,
therefore it cannot be determined that the coefficient for the Democrat
variable does not equal zero. Therefore
no difference in the unemployment rate can be determined for either political party. The coefficients
and standard errors for all of the parameters of the equation are in the table
below. All of the other variables have
T-statistics that are higher than the critical value of 1.98, they are therefore deemed significantly different from zero.
|
Sample (adjusted): 1959:2 2002:3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Included observations: 174 after adjusting
endpoints |
|
|
|
|
|
Variable |
Coefficient |
Std. Error |
t-Statistic |
Prob. |
|
DEMOCRAT |
-0.250848 |
0.171432 |
-1.463250 |
0.1453 |
|
TBILLINTERSTRATE |
0.243937 |
0.034300 |
7.111757 |
0.0000 |
|
CHANGEMONEYSUP |
0.267808 |
0.043144 |
6.207244 |
0.0000 |
|
GOVDEF |
-0.007915 |
0.000797 |
-9.928842 |
0.0000 |
|
C |
3.729840 |
0.290841 |
12.82433 |
0.0000 |
|
R-squared |
0.531478 |
Mean
dependent var |
5.918199 |
|
|
Adjusted R-squared |
0.520389 |
S.D.
dependent var |
1.480551 |
|
|
S.E. of regression |
1.025340 |
Akaike info criterion |
2.916241 |
|
|
Sum squared resid |
177.6735 |
Schwarz
criterion |
3.007018 |
|
|
Log likelihood |
-248.7130 |
F-statistic |
47.92718 |
|
|
Durbin-Watson stat |
0.271623 |
Prob(F-statistic) |
0.000000 |
|
Conclusion
The variables for t-bill interest
rate, change in money supply and government deficit all have a significant
effect on the unemployment rate. When
these variables change, the unemployment rate will also change. The Democrat variable is not significant,
which means that the change in the unemployment rate will on average be the
same when there is a Democratic president and when there is a Republican
president. This means that although the
two parties are assumed to have different goals the
end result for the unemployment rate is the same.
Site Author: Traci Kinney
Last modified: 11/5/03