Writing is one of the most important tasks in most professions. Through writing and attendant presentation of data and interpretations, you transmit to the rest of the world what you have done, and leave a more or less permanent record of what you did and what you learned. Poor writing, poor data presentation, and sloppy reasoning may cause your hard work to be dismissed. Therefore, please write and proof read your reports carefully. The purpose of these lab writeups is to:

Text

As mentioned in the syllabus, reports should be written as though they were being submitted to a research journal. This means not writing things like: "In this lab I did..." or "I had a hard time with Excel equations...." Instead, the report should be a clear and concise narrative of what you did, how you did it, what the results are, and your interpretations as supported by your own evidence and that of others.

  1. A brief discussion of the geochemical topic or problem being investigated in the lab exercise.
  2. A brief description of the samples, collection procedures, and analytical procedures.
  3. A brief description of the data, with tables and graphs as appropriate, statistical analysis where appropriate, and a brief description of the calculations done, computer models used, or special programs used.
  4. A brief summary of what was learned in the lab exercise, and possibly how it compares to what was expected or what others have learned.
  5. Give proper citations and complete references for material taken from the literature, which includes your textbook.

Figures

Figures should be professional-looking to the extent that Excel permits it.

  1. Figures should be cited in the text and at the start of the caption as Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.
  2. All figures must have a caption.
  3. All parts of the figure must be clear, containing all needed information but no extraneous junk.
  4. Extraneous junk includes: redundant titles, unneeded decimal places, keys for graphs with only one thing plotted.

Tables

Tables should be professional-looking to the extent that Excel permits it better here than for graphs).

  1. Tables should be cited in the test and at the start of the caption as Table 1, Table 2, etc.
  2. All tables must have a 1-sentence caption.
  3. All parts of the table must be clear, with row, column, and section headings organized to guide the eye and make it obvious what each part of the table is for.
  4. Use lines to separate headings, major sections, and other places to additionally help guide the eye and make the table more obvious. Note that editors generally frown on just using the standard grid.
  5. Avoid extraneous decimal places, cryptic labels, opaque abbreviations, etc., unless you have to. Explain these in footnotes at the bottom of the table.

Hint

Look at real scientific journal articles to see how writing, figures, tables, citations, and references are done. I know this is something you have done before, but actually pay attention this time.

Format guidelines

Grading

The written reports will be graded on a 0 to 10 scale, and figures and tables graded on a 0 to 5 scale. The numerical scores don't correspond to letter grades, but rather will be figured into your total numerical score at the end of the term. However, a score of 5 or lower for the text and 3 for figures and tables indicates that immediate and substantial improvement is warranted.

WARNING! Although you will usually work in groups, all work handed in must be your own. This includes text, graphs, drawings, and data tables, including those printed by computer. Text, graphs, and tables that look identical probably are.

Here are my personal grading guidelines that I actually use to assign grades to reports, tables, and figures. Each subscore is summed for a final lab report score. A sliding scale of extra credit will be given for properly cited material presented in reports that comes from outside of the course materials and the text. This extra credit is not indicated in the guidelines below. For more writing tips go here, or see any professional scientific journal for examples.

 

Text grading scheme. High-quality scientific writing is key here. It must be concise, logical, and complete. It must tell the story of what you did, what the data are, and what interpretations and conclusions you can make, and why.
10 Presentation of the purpose, data, and interpretation demonstrates a high degree of scientific, writing, and thinking competence. A report in this category generally has the following properties:
  • Well-organized and concise.
  • Clearly distinguishes between fact and interpretation.
  • Accurate and complete description of factual data.
  • Accurate and complete interpretation.
  • Uses relevant data in a clear and logical way to support the interpretations, refers to all figures and tables.
  • Free or nearly free of errors in language mechanics, word usage, and spelling.
  • References cited consistently and correctly.
8 Presentation of the purpose, data, and interpretation demonstrates a good degree of scientific, writing, and thinking competence. A report in this category generally has the following properties:
  • Fairly well-organized and reasonably concise.
  • Fact and interpretation are usually well distinguished.
  • Description of factual data is largely complete and accurate.
  • Mostly accurate and complete interpretation.
  • Relevant data is used in a logical way to support some of the interpretations, some figures and tables referenced.
  • Largely free of errors in language mechanics, word usage, and spelling.
  • References cited, but may be incomplete.
6 Presentation of the purpose, data, and interpretation demonstrates an adequate degree of scientific, writing, and thinking competence. A report in this category generally has the following properties:
  • Adequately organized.
  • Fact and interpretation are sometimes distinguished.
  • Description of factual data is adequate, but may be somewhat incomplete or inaccurate.
  • Interpretation is adequate but may be somewhat incomplete or inaccurate.
  • Relevant data are used to support some of the interpretations, but there may be problems with the logic of the support. Few or no figures or tables referenced.
  • No severe or systematic errors in language mechanics, word usage, or spelling.
  • References cited, but reference citation may be seriously incomplete.
4 Presents parts of the purpose, data, and interpretation, but may be without logical connection or logical form. A report in this category has at least one of the following problems:
  • Inadequate or illogical organization.
  • Fact is commonly confused with interpretation.
  • Description of factual data is seriously incomplete.
  • Interpretation is seriously incomplete.
  • Relevant data are not significantly used to support the interpretations, or there are serious flaws in the logic of support.
  • A pattern of serious errors in language mechanics, word usage, or spelling.
  • References not appropriately cited.
2 Little coherent description of the purpose, data, or interpretation connected with the assignment. A report in this category has at least one of the following problems:
  • Little discernible organization.
  • Inaccurate representation of the facts.
  • Description of factual data is missing.
  • Interpretation is missing.
  • No data are used to support the interpretations, or severe flaws in the logic of support.
  • A pattern of persistent, major errors in language mechanics, word usage, or spelling.
  • References not appropriately cited.
0 A report in this category has at least one of the following problems.
  • No discernible organization.
  • Incoherent or severely inaccurate language mechanics or word usage.
  • Failure to address the topic. Failure to turn in the assignment on time.
  • References not cited at all. Note that this is a form of plagiarism!
  • Plagiarism! Ugh! It is better to do nothing than to do this!

 

 

Figure grading scheme. Figures should have accurate and complete axis labels, reasonable scales, clearly identified data sets (if more than one data set is presented), and a caption. Figures in each category are typically:
5
  • Captions clear, accurate, and complete in their description of the content and purpose.
  • Axis ranges and scales are appropriate for showing what is intended.
  • Axis labels and titles are clear, accurate, and appropriate.
  • Data sets are clearly identified (if >1 set) and distinguished.
  • Overall appearance is clear, professional, and uncluttered.
4
  • Captions largely clear, accurate, and complete in their description of the content and purpose.
  • Axis ranges are appropriate for showing what is intended.
  • Axis labels and titles are clear, accurate, and appropriate.
  • Data sets are clearly identified (if >1 set) and distinguished.
  • Overall appearance is mostly professional-looking and uncluttered.
3
  • Captions mostly clear, accurate, and complete in their description of the content and purpose, but there may be some unclear or omitted information.
  • Axis ranges show what is intended, but may include extraneous range.
  • Axis labels and titles are mostly accurate, and appropriate.
  • Data sets are present but may not be clearly identified or distinguished.
  • Overall appearance is somewhat cluttered or disorganized.
2
  • Captions are incomplete in some important way, or are duplicated in some way.
  • Axis ranges may not be appropriate for showing what is intended.
  • Axis labels and titles may not all be appropriate or correct.
  • Data sets may not be clearly identified (if >1 set) and distinguished.
  • Overall appearance is cluttered or unprofessional-looking.
1
  • Captions are poorly written, giving little idea of the figure content or purpose.
  • Axis ranges are inappropriate.
  • Axis labels and titles are inaccurate or largely inappropriate.
  • Data sets are poorly represented.
  • Overall appearance is down-right sloppy.
0
  • Captions absent or largely meaningless in context.
  • Axes not labeled or labeled wrong.
  • Axis labels and titles are missing or wrong.
  • Data sets are indistinguishable (if >1 set) or wrong.
  • Figure is missing or data source not referenced.

 

 

Table grading scheme. Tables must clearly present the data and calculated values, must allow the reader to easily understand the content and purpose of the different columns and rows, different table sections should be easily distinguished, reasonable numbers of decimal places should be used, and each table should have a clear and concise caption. Tables in each category are typically:
5
  • Captions clear, accurate, and complete in their description of content and purpose.
  • Columns and rows are arranged in a logical, compact way.
  • Row and column headings are descriptive, accurate, formatted clearly, and aid the reader in understanding the content even without the caption.
  • Data areas are clearly formatted, in particular the number of decimal places is appropriate for estimated precision.
  • Calculated values are correct.
  • Overall appearance is clear, professional, and uncluttered; lines are used appropriately to make the table easier to read.
4
  • Captions largely clear and accurate in their description of content and purpose.
  • Columns and rows are generally well arranged.
  • Row and column headings are largely descriptive, accurate, and aid the reader in understanding the content even without the caption.
  • Data areas are clearly formatted, in particular the number of decimal places is appropriate for the precision.
  • Calculated values are correct.
  • Overall appearance is clear, professional, and uncluttered.
3
  • Captions mostly accurate in their description of content and purpose, but may not be completely clear or complete.
  • Columns and rows are generally well arranged.
  • Row and column headings are descriptive and aid the reader to understand the table.
  • Data areas are understandable, but there may be some consistent problem with formatting, particularly with the number of decimal points.
  • Some calculated values may be incorrect.
  • Overall appearance is understandable, but not formatted for clarity.
2
  • Captions are incomplete in some important way, or are duplicated in some way.
  • Columns and rows are not arranged logically or compactly.
  • Row and column headings are difficult to interpret.
  • Data areas are poorly formatted.
  • Some calculated values may be incorrect.
  • No attempt to limit the number of decimal places.
  • Overall appearance is cluttered and/or disorganized and/or hard to follow.
1
  • Captions are poorly written, giving little idea of the table content or purpose.
  • Columns and rows are arranged haphazardly with no clear plan, some may be missing.
  • Row and column headings are wrong or difficult to interpret.
  • Data areas are poorly formatted and may contain numerous incorrect or missing values.
  • Overall appearance is sloppy and hard to follow; no clear attempt to format for easier reading.
0
  • Captions absent or largely meaningless.
  • Important columns or rows missing, no clear plan to the arrangement.
  • Row and column headings are wrong or confusing.
  • Data areas are poorly formatted, may contain numerous incorrect values, and important values may be missing.
  • Table is missing.