
| Sophomore Research Seminar--Fall Term, 2009 (Professor R. V. Wells)
Salem Witchcraft, 1692 |
| Contents |
Publication types
Primary sources (beyond Salem)
Secondary sources (Salem and beyond)
Style and other miscellaneous issues
![]()
Historians distinguish between primary vs. secondary sources. "Secondary" is easier to define: what historians write about past phenomena. Primary sources, however, take many forms--correspondence, diaries, personal narratives, official government records, news reports, advertisements and other kinds of popular expressions. Primary sources are usually contemporary with the past phenomena under study. A source is still primary though it is no longer in its “original format”: a letter written by Lincoln to his cabinet may be more widely found because it has been published in a book as part of a collection of such letters or digitized on a web-site.
The best known examples of secondary sources are books and journal articles. But actual searching usually turns up other formats: papers in collected volumes, chapters, dissertations, and others.
Why are the primary/secondary distinction and publication format important? The primary source and the secondary source differ in what we learn from them. But there are at least three other practical reasons to understand the distinction:
-
finding the source (physically),
-
citing it correctly, and
-
shaping your search strategy to find more.
![]()
| Primary sources (on Salem directly) |
Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project
The University of Virginia's website found at http://etext.virginia.edu/salem/witchcraft/home.html
Famous American Trials: Salem Witchcraft Trials, 1692
Part of a suite of websites on historically famous trials; sponsored by a member of the faculty at the law school of the University of Missouri, Kansas City.
Salem Witchcraft Papers, by Paul Boyer and Stephen Nissenbaum (1977). At Schaffer Library, call number: KFM2478.8.W5 S24. Also full-text at the above website, where you click on Documents and Transcriptions>>More.
Records of the Salem Witch-Hunt, edited by Bernard Rosenthal (2008). Call number: [q] KFM2478.8.W5 R43 2009.
| Primary sources (beyond Salem) |
Checklist of Primary Sources for Early American History (c. 1492-1815) in Schaffer Library, Union College, Schenectady, NY. Compiled by Robert V. Wells, Department of History, 2002.
Using the Schaffer Library Catalog
Try the keyword search method in Schaffer's online catalog using this pattern.
Finding primary source materials in Schaffer Library databases
Here are selected online sources to which Union College subscribes. They are searchable by topic, name, place, and date, and they provide the full text of the material to which their titles refer. Note: the links take you to the Library's databases page, where the title of the database is listed along with others starting with the same letter of the alphabet.
Early English Books Online (EEBO)
Eighteenth Century Collection Online (ECCO)
Black Thought and Culture: African Americans from Colonial Times to the Present
In the First Person: Index to Letters, Diaries, Oral Histories, and Other Personal Narratives
North American Immigrant Letters, Diaries, and Oral Histories
North American Women's Letters
Social and Cultural History: Letters and Diaries Online
Women and Social Movements in the United States, 1600-2000
Websites with applicable full-text primary source historical documents
Here is a selected list of free and public websites with primary sources from the era of the Salem witch trials:
American Beginnings: the European Presence in North America, 1492-1690 (and Beyond)
"a collection of primary resources--historical documents, literary texts, and works of art"An American Time Capsule: Broadsides and Printed Ephemera ~ ca. 1600-2000
Part of the Library of Congress’ vast database of digital images entitled American Memory. Search either or both.Web Resources for Early American Literature: a Beginning
See in particular the links under "Puritanism."
Important: The above are academically sound. They have been produced by the National Humanities Center, Rutgers, and Lehigh respectively. However, out on the Web one rapidly moves to less academically sound sites. Evaluating Web-sites before you "trust" them is the point of several guidelines found on Evaluating Web Pages: Techniques to Apply and Questions to Ask, a page provided by the library of UC Berkeley.
More detail on Web-site evaluation follows below under "Should you 'google'?"
The reference librarians at Schaffer Library would be happy to assist you in this as well.
Secondary sources (Salem and beyond)
Using the Schaffer Library Catalog by SUBJECT,
try these or your own subject headings in subject-search mode:*Demonology
*Persecution
*Puritans
*Trials (witchcraft)
*Witchcraft
*The above and other topical headings may/should be narrowed by adding salem or massachusetts or united states on the end, for a more focused search. Example: puritans--massachusetts (the dashes are optional)
Geography can be the subject too:
Massachusetts--social conditions
Massachusetts--social life and customsSalem (Mass.)--history--colonial period
etc., as in Massachusetts above)United States--history--colonial period
etc., as in Massachusetts above)
Using the Schaffer Library Catalog by KEYWORD,
try the keyword search mode with your own terms: