Community Standards

Disciplinary Procedures

This section of the Code of Student Conduct is designed to provide students and student organizations with information regarding the procedures that can be expected after a possible violation of College policy. This information will instruct and guide students, faculty, and staff involved in the various stages of the conduct process properly. These procedures are intended to ensure a safe, fair, and equitable process for all students and student organizations.

Any member of the College community may submit an account of a student or recognized student organization for violating the Code of Student Conduct.

Persons who are not members of the College community may submit an account of a student or recognized student organization violating the Code of Student Conduct.

A charge shall be prepared in writing and directed to the Director of Community Standards & Accountability. There is no time limit for the submission of charges; however, it is preferable that a charge be submitted as soon as possible after the event takes place, as the passage of time may impede efforts to investigate allegations and gather evidence.

Reports of alleged violations must be submitted via an Incident Reporting Form.

If an incident involves an alleged violation of a policy not subject to this Code, the Incident Reporting Form may serve as a general intake form.

The Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, shall review all incident reports in consultation with appropriate staff to determine whether a student or student organization will be charged with violating the Code of Student Conduct, authorize an investigation to determine if the charges have merit, and/or if they can be referred to an Informal Resolution process by mutual consent of the parties involved on a basis acceptable to the Director of Community Standards & Accountability.

Such disposition shall be final and there shall be no subsequent proceedings.

The Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, will designate an administrator to investigate the charges. In the event of allegations of behavior in violation of the College’s Title IX Policy or Gender-based Misconduct Policy, the Director will refer the matter to the Title IX Coordinator. The Director, or their designee, will make a good faith effort to notify the student or student organization that they are subject to an investigation, and that charges have been or may be submitted, if, when and to the extent consistent with the need to maintain the integrity of the investigation.

A matter involving a violation of the Code of Student Conduct may be referred to one of the following hearing bodies and/or processes:

  • Administrative Review;
  • Informal Resolution;
  • Conduct Conference;
  • Hearing by the Judicial Hearing Board, Student Conduct Committee, or Organizational Misconduct Committee (a “Hearing”).

All charges shall be presented to the Alleged Student or organization in written form. A time shall be set for a Hearing, if one is to occur, not less than one (1) nor more than seven (7) business days after the student or organization has been notified. Maximum time limits for scheduling of Hearings may be extended at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability.

Hearings

Hearings shall be conducted by the applicable Hearing Board or Committee according to the following guidelines;

  • Hearings shall be conducted in private.
  • The Complainant, Alleged Student or permitted organizational representative(s) (as applicable), and their advisors, if any, shall be allowed to attend the entire portion of the Hearing at which information is received (excluding deliberations).
  • Admission of any other person to the Hearing shall be at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee.
  • In Hearings involving more than one Alleged Student, the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, in their discretion, may permit the Hearing concerning each Student to be conducted either separately or jointly.

Advisors

The Complainant and the Alleged Student or organization have the right to be assisted by an advisor they choose.

  • The advisor must be a member of the College community, and may not be an attorney.
  • The Complainant and/or the Alleged Student or permitted organizational representative(s) is/are responsible for presenting their own information, and therefore, advisors are not permitted to speak or to participate directly in the Hearing.
  • A student or organization should select as an advisor a person whose schedule allows attendance at the scheduled date and time for the Hearing. Delays will not normally be allowed due to the scheduling conflicts of an advisor.

Witnesses

The Complainant, the Alleged Student or organization, and the applicable Hearing Board or Committee may arrange for witnesses to present pertinent information to the Board or Committee.

  • The College will try to arrange the attendance of possible witnesses, if reasonably possible, and who are identified by the Complainant and/or Alleged Student or organization at least two weekdays prior to the Hearing.
  • Parties and witnesses may be asked to provide information to and answer questions from the Board or Committee.
  • Questions may be suggested by the Alleged Student or organization and/or Complainant to be answered by each other or by other witnesses who are present. This will be conducted by the Board or Committee with such questions directed to the Chairperson, rather than to the party or witness directly; the Chairperson will then pose those questions they deem to be appropriate. This method is used to preserve the educational tone of the Hearing and to avoid creation of an adversarial environment.
  • Questions of whether potential witnesses or information will be received shall be resolved in the discretion of the Chairperson.

Other Considerations

  • Pertinent records, exhibits, and written statements (including Impact Statements) may be accepted as information for consideration by a Hearing Board or Committee at the discretion of the chairperson or Director of Community Standards & Accountability.
  • Formal rules of process, procedure, and/or technical rules of evidence, such as are applied in criminal or civil court, are not used in Code proceedings. All procedural questions are subject to the final decision of the Chairperson of the Hearing Board or Committee.
  • After the portion of the Hearing concludes in which all pertinent information has been received, the Hearing Board or Committee shall deliberate privately and determine whether the Alleged Student or organization has violated each section of the Code which the student or organization is charged with violating (a student or organization may be found responsible for an alleged violation only if a majority of those Hearing Board or Committee members participating in the deliberations determine that the student or organization is responsible).
    • Hearing Board panels make their decisions based on the majority vote of the votes cast.
    • In cases where a majority vote is not obtained, the student will receive a finding of no determination.
  • In order to determine that a student or student organization violated the Code of Student Conduct, it must be determined by a preponderance of the evidence that BOTH a violation has occurred AND that the student or student organization committed that violation.
  • There shall be a single verbatim record, such as an audio and/or audiovisual recording, of all Hearings before a Hearing Board or Committee (not including deliberations). Deliberations shall not be recorded. The record shall be the sole property of the College. Administrative Reviews, Conduct Conferences and Informal Resolution meetings are not recorded.
  • If an Alleged Student or organizational representative does not appear before a Hearing, the information in support of the charges shall be presented and considered even if the Alleged Student or organizational representative is not present.
  • The Hearing Board or Administrator may accommodate concerns for the personal safety, well-being, and/or fears of confrontation of the Complainant, Alleged Student, organizational representative(s) and/or witnesses during the Hearing by providing separate facilities, by using a visual screen, and/or by permitting participation by telephone, video conference, closed circuit television, audio and/or audiovisual recording, written statement, or other means, where and as determined in the sole judgment of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability to be appropriate.

Standard of Proof

In order to determine that the student has violated the Student Conduct Code, a majority of the Student Conduct Committee or Organizational Misconduct Board members present at the hearing must conclude that by a preponderance of the evidence a violation has occurred.

A “preponderance of evidence” means a finding that it is more likely than not that a violation occurred.

Types of Resolution

  • Administrative Reviews

    Administrative Reviews are informal discussions between a student alleged to be in violation of Code of Student Conduct and the Director of Community Standards & Accountability (or a designated administrator including, but not limited to, Community Directors, Deans, or Directors), and would not (in the judgment of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability) normally result in a suspension or more severe sanction if the student were found responsible.

    In these proceedings, the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, determines the responsibility of an Alleged Student for a violation of Code of Student Conduct, based on the information available to them.

    The Alleged Student will be notified by email of specific violations under consideration in advance of this discussion. If the violation involves multiple students (e.g., students who reside in the same dwelling) and if all the students consent and the consent is documented, all the students may be subject to the same Review at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability.

    The Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, will review the charges with the Complainant and Alleged Student(s) and give them an opportunity to respond. The Director or designee will then determine, by a preponderance of the evidence, whether the Alleged student is responsible for each charge and, if the student is found responsible, will assess appropriate sanctions.

    If a student fails to attend an Administrative Review, the Director or their designee may resolve the case without benefit of the student’s input.

    In determining sanctions, the Director, or their designee, will take into account the factors described in the Sanctions section of this Code.

    • If multiple students are subject to the same Administrative Review, each student may be subject to different sanctions as a result of different considerations or circumstances.

    Outcomes from Administrative Reviews are subject to appeal.

  • Informal Resolution

    Informal Resolutions are typically discussions between a student alleged to be in violation of the Code of Student Conduct and the Director of Community Standards & Accountability (or a designated administrator including, but not limited to, Community Directors, Deans, and Directors), where a finding or responsibility would not (in the judgment of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability) normally result in a suspension or more severe sanction.

    In these proceedings, the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, and the student may agree to the fact that a violation occurred. If the student does not agree, the case may be forwarded to an Administrative Review or a Hearing.

    The Alleged student will be notified by email of specific violations under consideration in advance of this discussion. If the violation involves multiple students (e.g., students who reside in the same dwelling) and if all the students consent and the consent is documented, all the students may be subject to the same Informal Resolution process at the discretion of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability.

    The Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, will review the charges with the Complainant and the Alleged student(s) and give them an opportunity to respond. If the student accepts responsibility, the Director, or their designee, will issue the appropriate sanction(s).

    Outcomes from Informal Resolutions are not subject to appeal.

  • Conduct Conference

    An organization that admits responsibility may request to forgo an Organizational Misconduct Committee Hearing and have its case decided by the Director of Community Standards & Accountability or their designee in a Conduct Conference. If the Director agrees to a Conduct Conference, they or their designee will meet with the organization’s president or designated spokesperson, and may impose any sanction(s) appropriate to the circumstances. Organizations admitting to disciplinary allegations and requesting a Conduct Conference may not have an Advisor or observer present.

    Outcomes of Conduct Conferences are not subject to appeal.

    If the Director denies the request for a Conduct Conference or if the organization prefers an Organizational Misconduct Committee Hearing, the case will be heard according to standard procedures.

Hearing Panels

  • Judicial Hearing Board

    Composed of three (3) members from a pool of faculty and staff who will determine the responsibility of any student(s) alleged to have violated the Code of Student Conduct. In addition, the Chair of this Hearing Board will be the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, who will not have a vote. The pool of faculty and staff members will be approved by the Vice President of Student Affairs. The Judicial Hearing Board will adjudicate cases involving allegations of the Code of Student Conduct that may result in suspension or expulsion as referred by the Vice President of Student Affairs.

  • Student Conduct Committee

    Composed of five (5) members from a pool of students, and the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or designee, who will be present throughout the Hearing and the deliberations of the Student Conduct Committee, but who will not have a vote. The student members of the pool are selected by a process approved by the Student Forum. The chairperson and vice-chairperson will be elected annually by the members of the Student Conduct Committee. If the chairperson is unable to preside at a Hearing, the vice-chairperson will serve in their stead.

  • Organizational Misconduct Committee

    Composed of four (4) members from the Committee on Hazing, made up of the following; the Director of Campus Safety, the Associate Director of Greek Leadership, the Director of Student Activities, and the Director of Athletics. Three (3) of these members will be present throughout the Hearing and the deliberations, and will each have a vote on responsibility. In addition, the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, will be present as the Chair, but will not have a vote.

General Matters

All Judicial Hearing Board, Student Conduct Committee, and Organizational Misconduct Committee members will serve as volunteers and will be trained in FERPA, confidentiality, procedures, applicable policies and rules of the College and the philosophy of the Code of Student Conduct at Union College.

Hearings before these bodies need not conform to formal rules of criminal or civil procedure and/or proof requirements. The intent of the procedure is to provide the Alleged student or organization with a fundamentally fair process, including notice of the charges against them and a reasonable opportunity to respond. Within this framework, the Hearing Board or Committee may conduct the Hearing as it sees fit, and make necessary modifications to these procedures as it deems appropriate in particular circumstances while still providing a fundamentally fair process.

Sanctions

  • Definition of Sanction

    Following a Hearing or other conduct proceeding, the student or organization found responsible and, with respect to a crime of violence as defined by FERPA, the Complainant (if the Complainant was subjected to such conduct), will be notified in writing that based on the information presented:

    • A violation of the Code of Student Conduct was determined to have occurred, and that the Alleged Student or organization was responsible; or
    • A determination was reached that a violation of the Code of Student Conduct did not occur, and/or that the Alleged Student or organization was not responsible.

    In the event that the Alleged Student or organization is found responsible following a Judicial Hearing Board, Student Conduct Committee, or Organizational Misconduct Committee Hearing, it is the responsibility of the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, to determine reasonable sanctions to impose as a result of the decision of responsibility.

  • Notification of Sanctions

    The notification of this determination will be sent electronically to the Responsible Student or organization. If the Hearing Board or Committee determined that a crime of violence as defined by FERPA occurred, the Complainant (if the Complainant was subjected to such conduct), will also be notified of the sanction. Notification to others will occur at the discretion of the College, consistent with applicable law (including without limitation FERPA).

  • Purpose

    Union College utilizes disciplinary consequences as opportunities for introspection, understanding, growth, and learning. Deliberate consideration is paid to the assessment of appropriate and meaningful sanctions in order to provide the best opportunity for students or organizations to understand the ramifications and effects that their behavior may have on themselves, their peers, and the Union College community.

    The Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or their designee, will assess sanctions that carefully consider the following:

    • Impact of Sanctioning and Impact Statements and/or,
    • Proportionality and Consistency and/or,
    • Prior Disciplinary History and/or,
    • Other information.
  • Impact of Sanctions and Impact Statements

    The impact of the sanction on the student or organization, the Complainant (if applicable) and the College community may be considered when determining appropriate sanctions.

    Complainants and Alleged student(s) or organizations may offer a statement explaining their conduct to the decision-maker.

    These statements are open-ended, and are intended to help the decision-maker determine sanctions that are most appropriate.

    Impact Statements are to be submitted to the Director of Community Standards & Accountability, or the Hearing Officer, prior to the start of the hearing.

  • Proportionality & Consistency

    Sanctions will be proportionate to the nature and severity of, and circumstances surrounding, the violation, and consistent with sanctions imposed in prior cases at the College arising from similar facts and circumstances.

  • Prior Disciplinary History

    The student’s or organization’s prior disciplinary history may be relevant to consider when determining appropriate sanctions.

    A student’s or organization’s history will not be considered when determining responsibility.

  • Other Relevant Information

    There may be other information deemed relevant by the Director of Community Standards or their designee to consider when determining appropriate sanctions.

  • Rationale

    When a student or organization is assigned sanctions, any notification will include a rationale detailing how and why the sanctions that are assigned were determined.

Possible Sanctions

  • Available Sanctions for Individual Students

    Sanctions that may be imposed upon any student found to have violated the Code of Student Conduct include but are not limited to:

    • Warning - A notice in writing to the student that the student has violated or is violating the Code of Student Conduct. Warnings may be considered in any further disciplinary proceedings.
    • Probation - A written reprimand for violation of the Code of Student Conduct. Probation is for a designated period of time and includes the probability of more severe disciplinary sanctions if the student is found to violate the Code of Student Conduct during the probationary period. Probation may be imposed with or without restrictions. Probation may be considered in any further disciplinary proceedings. Restrictions associated with College probation may include, but are not limited to, ineligibility for participation in designated College-sponsored programs or activities, and/or other appropriate actions.
    • Loss of privileges - Denial of specified privileges permanently or for a designated period of time. These privileges can include, but are not limited to: attending College events, club or organization membership, athletic participation*, visitation of certain buildings or residential facilities, etc.
    • Fines – In some circumstances, reasonable fines may be imposed. Such fines are in addition to costs of restitution that are deemed appropriate.
    • Restitution - Compensation for loss, damage, or injury. This may take the form of appropriate service and/or monetary or material replacement.
    • Discretionary sanctions - Work assignments, essays, service to the College, or other assigned tasks.
    • Educational and developmental outcomes - Educational requirements are meant to provide individual development, improvement or education.
    • Residence Hall suspension - Separation of the student from the residence halls for a definite period of time, after which the student is eligible for return. Conditions for return may be specified.
    • Behavioral Plan - A plan that clearly defines additional behavioral expectations, standards, and/or obligations that a student is required to follow.
    • No Contact Order - A written directive prohibiting contact with another person, either directly or through a third party.
    • Residence Hall expulsion - Permanent separation of the student from the residence halls.
    • College suspension - Separation of the student from the College for a definite period of time, after which the student is eligible for return. Conditions for return may be specified.
    • College expulsion - Permanent separation of the student from the College.
    • Deferred College suspension - In cases of suspension, there may be circumstances that mitigate against the immediate separation of the student from the College. For example, a student may be allowed to complete the current trimester’s coursework and begin their suspension period at the term’s end. However, should the student be found in violation of the Code of Student Conduct in the time period between the decision to suspend and when the suspension is effective, the suspension will take effect immediately and remain in effect until the specified expiration date of the original suspension.
    • Revocation of Degree - A degree awarded from the College may be revoked for fraud, misrepresentation, or other violation of College standards in obtaining the degree, or for other serious violations committed by a student prior to graduation.
    • Withholding degree and/or diploma - The College may withhold awarding a degree and/or diploma otherwise earned for a specified period of time or until the completion of the process set forth in this Code, including the completion of other sanctions imposed, if any**.
    • Behavioral and/or Mental Health Assessment - A health assessment conducted by a qualified practitioner, as well as the completion of all recommendations made as a result of the assessment.
    • Special Action - Other actions appropriate to particular circumstances, but not included in the preceding list. Some examples include, but are not limited to, prevention of participation in intramural athletics or College-associated organizations, ineligibility for participation in designated College-sponsored programs, and/or other appropriate actions.
    • More than one of the sanctions listed above may be imposed for any single violation.

    Maintenance and Keeping of Disciplinary Records

    • Other than College expulsion or revocation or withholding of a degree, disciplinary sanctions shall not be made part of the student’s permanent academic record, but shall become part of the student’s disciplinary record. Upon graduation, the student’s disciplinary record may be expunged of disciplinary actions other than residence hall expulsion, College suspension, College expulsion, or revocation or withholding of a degree, upon application to the Director of Community Standards & Accountability. Cases involving the imposition of sanctions other than those identified shall be expunged from the student’s disciplinary record seven years after final disposition of the case.
    *Restrictions of participation in intercollegiate athletics as a sanction under these procedures are separate and distinct from consequences that may be imposed by the College’s Department of Athletics under the Student-Athlete Code of Conduct.
    **In addition, the College may withhold a degree and/or diploma, and/or deny a student the ability to participate in commencement exercises, pending a final determination in a case subject to these procedures.
  • Available Sanctions for Student Organizations

    Sanctions that may be imposed upon any student organization found to have violated the Code of Student Conduct include but are not limited to:

    • Warning - A notice in writing to the organization that the organization has violated or is violating the Code of Student Conduct. Warnings may be considered in any further disciplinary proceedings.
    • Probation - A written reprimand for violation of the Code of Student Conduct. Probation is for a designated period of time and includes the probability of more severe disciplinary sanctions if the organization is found to violate the Code of Student Conduct during the probationary period. Probation may be imposed with or without restrictions. Probation may be considered in any further disciplinary proceedings. Restrictions associated with College probation may include, but are not limited to, loss of privileges of College-associated organizations, ineligibility for participation in designated College-sponsored programs or activities, and/or other appropriate actions.
    • Fines - In some circumstances, reasonable fines may be imposed. Such fines are in addition to costs of restitution that are deemed appropriate.
    • Restitution - Compensation for loss, damage, or injury. This may take the form of appropriate service and/or monetary or material replacement.
    • Discretionary sanctions - Work assignments, essays, service to the College, or other assigned tasks.
    • Educational and developmental outcomes - Educational requirements are meant to provide individual and organizational development, improvement or education.
    • Loss of Housing Status - Separation of the organization from housing for a definite period of time, after which the organization is eligible for return. Conditions for return may be specified.
    • Behavioral Plan - A plan that clearly defines additional behavioral expectations, standards, and/or obligations that an organization and its members are required to follow.
    • More than one of the sanctions listed above may be imposed for any single violation.
    • Loss of selected rights and privileges for a specified period of time.
    • The organization may be deactivated. Deactivation includes the loss of all College-recognized privileges, including College recognition, for a specified period of time. Organizational deactivation may be for a specified period of time or permanent.
      • No student may rush, pledge, perpetuate, engage in initiation activities, or become a member of a fraternal, social, or student organization not recognized by the College. Anyone engaging in those activities, either as a member, recruiter, or potential new member, will be suspended for a minimum of one year or may be subject to additional penalties that could include expulsion from the College. A fraternal, social, or student organization shall be covered by this rule if:
        • its leadership and/or a significant number of its members are Union College students, or
        • The members being recruited and offered membership are current Union College students.

    Any student who is uncertain about the legitimacy of any group is encouraged to inquire with the Offices for Greek Leadership or Student Activities.

Appeals

The purpose of an appeal is in response to procedure, not to provide a student with a new hearing. A student found responsible has the right to appeal any decision based only upon the grounds outlined below with respect to the violation(s) found to have occurred. The appeal is to be prepared by the student seeking the appeal, and no other individual on their behalf. There is no option for an appeal of sanctions issued through an Informal or Alternative Resolution. Appeals of decisions must be submitted within five (5) business days of receiving the hearing results.

The Appellate Body may review all materials presented at the hearing and may consult with the chair of the appropriate Hearing Board and/or the Director of Community Standards (or their designee) on questions of appropriateness of the sanctions and/or of judicial procedure.

Appeals shall be submitted based on the student’s ability to demonstrate that:

  • The hearing was materially inconsistent with the established judicial procedure;
  • New information was discovered after the hearing that could not have been readily discovered before the hearing and which might have had an effect on the outcome of the hearing;
  • Sanctions are grossly disproportionate to the conduct violation.

An appeal must set forth concisely the grounds for appeal, as well as any supporting material submitted by the Alleged Student.
A written decision will be rendered and communicated by the Appellate Body within ten (10) business days of receipt of the appeal.

The Appellate Body may:

  • Uphold the original decision,
  • Remove, add, or alter a Sanction,
  • Remand the case to the appropriate body for rehearing,
  • Remand the case to the appropriate body to reconsider sanction recommendation.

The outcome of the appeal is final.