Last Seminar of the Fall 2024 Term:
Thursday, October 31st- Presented by: Union College Professor of Mathematics Jeff Jauregui
Title: Voting, Power, and the Electoral College
Abstract: In a weighted voting system, the voters may have different numbers of votes. Examples include stockholders in a corporation, members of the U.N. security council, and the states in the U.S. electoral college. A power index is a way to quantify exactly how much power each voter wields, in terms of their ability to impact the results of an election. In this talk, I'll introduce the Shapley--Shubik and Banzhaf power indices and discuss their application to the imminent U.S. Presidential election.
October 28th- Presented by Guest Speaker: Amir Babak Aazami
Title: Films, Finance, and Wildfires- How geometry gets used in the real world
Abstract: The notion of "shortest distance" is central to geometry. In this talk we survey how this concept is used in modeling real-world phenomena: From the way streaming services give film recommendations, to finding the "least risky" portfolio in finance, and finally to new ways of modeling the spread of wildfires.
October 17th- Presented by: Audrey Benson, Hunter Gould, Grace Newcome and Josh Vaidman, Research Students of Prof. Mariano, Department of Mathematics.
Title: A Central Limit Theorem for Products of 2×2 Random Non-invertible Matrices and Applications
Abstract: The theory of the products of random matrices have been widely studied and applied in the fields of biology, dynamical systems, economics, engineering and statistical physics. We consider the product of an independent and identically distributed sequence of random non-invertible matrices with real entries. We prove an analog of the law of large numbers and give an explicit formula for this limit, which is called the Lyapunov exponent. We also prove a central limit theorem with an explicit formula for the variance in terms of the entries of the matrices. An important example where non-invertible matrices are essential is the random Hill’s equation, which has numerous physical applications, including the modeling of lunar orbits. Recently, the products of random non-invertible matrices have been used in the mathematical model of an art collector in economics.
Thursday, October 10th- Assistant Professor Caitlin Leverson
Title: A Friendly Introduction to Lagrangian Realizations of Ribbon Cobordisms
Abstract: A knot is an embedding of a circle into a space like R^3, which can be thought of as a piece of string that has been tied up and then had the ends glued together. Given two knots, a ribbon cobordism is a particularly nice surface with the two knots as its boundary (think the two circles that are at the boundary of a cylinder). Much work has been done to study these surfaces in the smooth topological setting. However, what happens when we add some geometric conditions and study knots and surfaces in what is called a contact or symplectic manifold? It has long been known that every smooth knot has a Legendrian representative (knot which satisfies some extra geometric conditions). In this talk we will discuss why an analogous statement is true for ribbon cobordisms. Along the way we will give a brief introduction to smooth knots, ribbon cobordisms, Legendrian knots, and Lagrangian cobordisms. This is joint work with John Etnyre.
Thursday, October 3rd- Professor Grant Moles, an Algebraist in the Union College Math Department
Kummer’s Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem: Pulling Questions from the Jaws of Defeat
Abstract: Fermat’s Last Theorem is a simple statement: there are no nontrivial integer solutions to the equation 𝑥2 + 𝑦2 = 𝑧2 for any integer 𝑛 ≥ 3. When Fermat first scribbled this statement in the margins of a book he was reading in 1637, he claimed to have a proof that just didn’t fit in the margins. After he died without publishing his (likely incorrect or nonexistent) proof, mathematicians struggled for centuries to prove this statement. It wasn’t until the 1990s that Andrew Wiles finally put the matter to bed, proving Fermat’s Last Theorem using elliptical curves, a technique far beyond what Fermat could ever have imagined. But was this really the first correct proof? In this talk, we’ll discuss a proof by Ernst Kummer from 1847 that, at first glance, certainly seems convincing. As it turns out, his work made a crucial error – an error that eventually gave birth to the field of Algebraic Number Theory. In particular, we’ll hone in on how abstract math can force us to challenge even our most fundamental of assumptions and how mathematical inquiry and proof don’t “fail” – they simply raise more questions.
Thursday, September 26th- hosted by CVS Health and Aetna
Underwriting and Actuary Recruiting Info Session
This event featured engaging presentations from experts in both actuarial science and underwriting, offering a valuable glimpse into these dynamic fields. Students learned about the latest industry trends, career opportunities, and how their studies can align with real-world applications.
Additionally, they discovered how Union's class offerings can help one build the skills needed for a successful career in these areas. The session concluded with a Q&A segment, giving students the chance to ask burning questions and gain personalized advice.
September 19th- Union College math alumna, Mary Annese, ACAS, CPCU, MAAA, Actuarial Director, Regulatory & Contractual Reporting at Verisk, and Melissa Epstein, ACAS, MAAA, Senior Actuarial Actuarial Procedures/Underwriting Solutions at Verisk
US News and World Report ranks Actuary among its 10 "Best Jobs", describing it as "actuarial science is a discipline that uses mathematics, statistics and financial theory to measure, manage and mitigate financial risk and uncertainty. Actuaries are essential to insurance companies, and they're increasingly finding niches in other businesses." (https://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/actuary). Join us to learn more about the profession and the experiences of two Union graduates who became actuaries.
September 12th- Union College William D. Williams Professor of Mathematics, Emeritus
Research Professor, William S. Zwicker
The Hypergame Paradox, or I Stubbed my Toes on the Foundations of Mathematics
Abstract: I was making up an exam question on Game Theory for a course at Union College, when I accidentally discovered a new paradox in mathematics. A paradox arises from two arguments, both seemingly correct, that contradict one another. A shallow paradox involves a cheap trick – a flaw in one of the arguments. Like the famous 1901 paradox of Bertrand Russell, the Hypergame Paradox is of the deeper kind that has no trick, but instead forces us to reconsider fundamental questions: what are the most basic truths of mathematics, from which everything else follows?
Hypergame differs from Russell’s Paradox in an interesting way, however – it is asymmetric, and can be mined to reveal proofs of several fundamental theorems. These proofs inherit the asymmetric flavor, and differ from the standard versions. Examples include Cantor’s result (any set X has fewer elements than its powerset, P(X)) as well as Turing’s proof of the insolvability of the halting problem.